• dx1@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s a way taller order than you might think. Docker has loads of kernel level integration that FreeBSD isn’t interested in supporting, also there are separate techs for similar purposes, like jails.

      • ryannathans@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, so if projects don’t support freebsd I’m out. Tired of everyone’s fetish for docker, even Canonical have added freebsd style jails to ubuntu now

        • Justin@lemmy.jlh.name
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          cgroups are very different and much more powerful than freebsd jails. The server world is leaving freebsd for Linux.

            • Justin@lemmy.jlh.name
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              The problem with podman is that we use stuff like Docker-compose and tilt at work, that require the docker daemon socket. I do try to use podman when possible, though. But yeah, I avoid Red Hat these days, that company is doomed.

              I use kubernetes+containerd for my servers, which is neither Docker nor Podman.

    • DacoTaco@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Podman to the rescue! Screw docker, podman is so much better and a quick google tells me there is a freebsd package of podman soooo