All I see with all of these lawsuits by red state AGs is the millions of dollars wasted that could have been used to actually help people in need.

We should be sueing companies that are involved in fragrances, underwear, lingerie, wedding accoutrements, and the like for in-store displays which promote heterosexuality.

It is immoral that we show such material to our children and, frankly, I find it disgusting that my representatives have let it go on long enough.

The fact that cartoons meant for children have male characters, clearly, becoming attracted to female characters insults my sensitivities.

cough jk cough… cough kinda cough

States co-signing it: Indiana, Arkansas, Idaho, Kentucky, Mississippi, Missouri, and South Carolina

I don’t use this word often, but I’m going to now.

Heinous.

These motherfuckers always seem to be concerned with what someone else is doing, like it’s any of their fucking business.

https://www.target.com/p/little-treasure-baby-boy-cotton-bodysuits-5pk-ladies-man/-/A-82482694

Obviously disgusting baby clothes. These should be added to the lawsuit along with any like them. /s if necessary

When your supposed “boycott” doesn’t work and you have to resort to banging on pots and pans for attention like a child.

I think if they actually took target to court I imagine it would be shut down pretty quickly, like the cases of trying to ban drag shows (even in very conservative states) … at least I hope so.

It is delusional posturing for delusional voters. When you’re complaining about rainbows on baby products, I mean - what design would they prefer on baby stuff?