• AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    It’s easy to get the impression that Discord chat messages are ephemeral, especially across different public servers, where lines fly upward at a near-unreadable pace.

    Joseph Cox at 404 Media confirmed that Spy Pet, a service that sells access to a database of purportedly 3 billion Discord messages, offers data “credits” to customers who pay in bitcoin, ethereum, or other cryptocurrency.

    Searching individual users will reveal the servers that Spy Pet can track them across, a raw and exportable table of their messages, and connected accounts, such as GitHub.

    As Cox notes, Discord doesn’t make messages inside server channels, like blog posts or unlocked social media feeds, easy to publicly access and search.

    As noted by 404 Media and confirmed by Ars, clicking on the “Request Removal” link plays a clip of J. Jonah Jameson from Spider-Man (the Tobey Maguire/Sam Raimi version) laughing at the idea of advance payment before an abrupt “You’re serious?”

    Those who haven’t paid for message access can only see fairly benign public-facing elements, like stickers, emojis, and charted member totals over time.


    The original article contains 420 words, the summary contains 177 words. Saved 58%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • AlexanderESmith@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    32
    ·
    7 months ago

    Who uh… cares? The information is publicly available, that’s how it was scraped… Who would /buy/ this?

    And what would they do with the knowledge that Fartknocker72 posted sonic slash fanfics?

    • just another dev@lemmy.my-box.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Who would /buy/ this?

      Have you heard of any companies in the past few years who are trying to mimic human speech? They need lots of example data to do that.

      And what would they do with the knowledge that Fartknocker72 posted sonic slash fanfics?

      While knowing that 1 specific person likes something is mostly irrelevant, once you link it to an email or real name (just wait for the next data beach), criminals could use that kinda data for blackmail.

      Furthermore, companies like Facebook and Google mostly make their money by linking people’s behaviour to their interests. They probably won’t be caught with their hand in this cookie jar, but it should show you how valuable this data (in massive quantities) is.

      • AlexanderESmith@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        15
        ·
        7 months ago

        criminals could use that kinda data for blackmail.

        Maybe… don’t say shit on the internet that would embarrass you if associated with your real name?

        • recursive_recursion [they/them]@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          7 months ago

          Maybe… don’t say shit on the internet that would embarrass you if associated with your real name?

          the problem arises from deobfuscation of identity through aggregation and correlation analysis of data

          • AlexanderESmith@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            7 months ago

            I understand the vector, I’m just saying that maybe if people had conducted themselves responsibly, this wouldn’t be an issue.

            Hiding behind a moniker to do things you would normally be shunned is bad for everyone. It allows trolls to thrive, reduces or removes the impetus for broader social change/evolution (offline, that is), and fosters echo chambers full of people who have zero responsibility to regulate what they say for the sake of sanity (because fuck it, who’s gonna call them on their bullshit, right? And even if someone does, “they’re” not being judged, “their profile” is, so they can separate themselves from any criticism without doing any self-reflecting).

            If you want to post something (text, art, etc) and you have to stop and think about your reputation, that’s a good thing. It means you should either not do something stupid, or you should stand behind your actions, and give support to others to do/say that thing.

            The other option is to post behind a fake name knowing that there are no consequences, and just call it a day (which is why the opinion of the average post is so easily dismissed at “some random person on the Internet”).

            And if you really do need anonymity (because the thing your discussing is super difficult or dangerous for you)… maybe don’t fucking have that conversation in a public discord channel?

        • Jax@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          7 months ago

          I don’t think people who struggle to read as much as you have any business talking about internet hygiene.

    • Poplar?@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 months ago

      I’ve a few times shared personal information to people I am friendly with in public chats, accidentally or while not putting much thought into it. I imagine there are others like me who wouldn’t want to be doxxed.