The latest IRS data on who bears the income-tax burden demonstrate yet again the benefits of lower tax rates over higher rates.

The latest IRS data on who bears the income tax burden demonstrate yet again the benefits of lower tax rates over higher rates.

When President Donald Trump entered office, the richest 1% of tax filers ($675,000 income and above) paid a little more than 40% of the income taxes collected.

The 2017 Trump tax cut reduced the effective highest federal tax rate to 37% from 42%.

But the most recent IRS tax return data (for 2021) confirm that even as these rates were lowered — not to mention the corporate tax rate cut from 35% to 21% — the share of the tax burden shouldered by the 1% rose to almost 46%.

Written by the guy who came up with the Laffer Curve, Arthur Laffer.

  • shalafi@lemmy.world
    0·
    4 months ago

    Damned interesting! OTOH, the wealth gap has exploded since 1980, so it seems natural that the 1%, being so very much richer, and the rest of us being so very much poorer (in relation!), would bear a higher percentage of the total tax burden.

    Can someone explain more? I’m no finance guy, but I’d guess there’s more than a 1-1 relationship here.

    • Jesusaurus@lemmy.world
      0·
      4 months ago

      Easy enough to understand with simple ratios. If the top 1% holds 50% of the nation’s wealth, we would expect they should pay somewhere around 50% of the nation’s taxes. If their wealth increases to 60% you would expect the amount of taxes they pay to go up by a relatively equal amount.

      Conversely the lower 99% would pay an inverse proportion of taxes. If the wealthy are becoming propositionally more wealthy, the less wealthy should be paying less of the nation’s taxes.

      Now, that doesn’t necessarily mean that someone in the 99% will actually pay less taxes, as their wealth is not increasing at the rate of the 1%. It just means that the wealthy should be paying more as their proportion of the nation’s wealth keeps growing.