• AFK BRB Chocolate@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      The shooting, or saying he wasn’t home? Seems like the shooting was pretty justified given they were actively trying to break down his door.

        • AFK BRB Chocolate@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          For sure a concern, but still seems like a reasonable action given that those guys didn’t look like they wanted to sell Tupperware.

        • vanderbilt@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          It’s a definite possibility and so is the resulting liability. However, unless that concrete is a facade or otherwise very thin it will probably stop handgun rounds up to even the .45 caliber size. If he’s using defensive rounds (hollow points), then penetration through concrete is reduced even further as they are made to expand and dump their kinetic energy within a very short distance after the expansion is triggered. The bullet damage to the wall is something he will certainly be liable for though, also his new screen door lol.

          See the following for an example: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qFwntHIWjaw

        • psycho_driver@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          I’m wondering if this is why they shot out their door at an angle instead of straight out. Not very likely for the bullets to go through concrete, but the door across the way? Yeah, a definite possibility. If the guy had that much presence of mind in that situation then good on him.

      • Death_Equity@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        10 months ago

        The gamble was shooting through the door and possibly hitting someone in the apartment across the way.

        Hopefully that cholo got perforated and nobody else.

            • Bleeping Lobster@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              12
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              10 months ago

              Correct me if I’m wrong, but it’s a reference to a subculture, not an ethnicity. Though most cholos are probably hispanic, being a ‘cholo’ isn’t down to your racial genetics, it’s a subculture.

              • DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                edit-2
                10 months ago

                It meant someone who has indigenous ancestry… ie, a racial term, since there are many American indigenous ethnicities.

                You could argue it doesn’t mean that anymore, but do you often hear it being applied to non-Hispanic people?

          • ChapolinColoradoNZ@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            10 months ago

            Always thought that this was how my fellow Mexicans called their gang members by but hey, thanks for caring about our gang member’s feelings.

              • ChapolinColoradoNZ@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                10 months ago

                Cabron! That wiki page clearly states (“gangster” in Mexico). It is a stereotype we use all the time and have no issues with. Same as you using “white men” to describe, I don’t know, caucasians? I don’t feel offended by it and so shouldn’t you on behalf of “mexican looking latino americanos who commit crimes”.

                • DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  10 months ago

                  Not really the same thing, I think. Though one could certainly note with some interest how all common slurs equating white ethnicities with crime have fallen out of style. In the 1920’s I’m sure we’d have had all kinds of ways to call someone an Irish criminal or whatever.

                  The only one I can even think of is if you called some vaguely Italian crook a goombah or Guido, and the first one would probably just confuse people who didn’t watch a bunch of Mafia movies.

                  And I’m not offended by the usage, just the pretense that this racial term isn’t a racial term. Not a huge fan of either intellectual dishonesty or just casual ignorance in general.

      • teft@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        10 months ago

        the shooting was pretty justified given they were actively trying to break down his door.

        Especially in texas.