• 34 Posts
  • 5.59K Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 15th, 2023

help-circle







  • As much as I hate advertisements and avoid them as much as possible, watching the evolution is somewhat fascinating in an anthropological sense. It’s like an arms race between companies and consumers, accelerated by consumer adaptation to previous ad strategies.

    You’ve got the old days, when ads mostly seemed to be about describing the features of products in a relatively factual manner.

    Then when most products have the same basic features you start focusing on single metric comparisons to competitors.

    Then when all the competitors are finding metrics where they’re the best you start leaning into mascots and brand loyalty and slogans.

    Then when everyone has branding and mascots you focus on how all the Cool People prefer your brand because it makes them Cool and Sexy

    Then when everyone assumes the content of ads can’t really be trusted as a useful metric you enter the fever-dream era where you shift to memorable skits about the product.

    Then when everyone gets used to memorable depictions of your product you enter the surrealist fever-dream era where the skits aren’t even really about the product anymore.

    Now it seems like we’re in the brainrot “flash your logo in the midst of visual overstimulation” era, but that’s about where I only see ads by accident anymore.

    I’d love to hear about how advertisements have evolved in recent years if anyone can fill me in, but not enough to watch them






  • So to recap: the revolutionary approach isn’t succeeding because it’s under attack by liberals, except the liberal attacks are ineffective as evidenced by an 18% approval rating (nevermind that polling actually shows 34%). Not sure how low approval ratings for liberals is evidence for the efficacy of revolutionaries. Also lowering approval for liberals only empowers the more virulently fascist conservatives.

    How, pray tell, does any of that demonstrate the strength of revolutionaries? None of that implies positive support for revolution, or organization necessary to implement that revolution, much less any likelihood of revolution securing the desired end goal.

    This approach just seems like toothless reactionary bluster.




  • You can do whatever you want, I do.

    The caveat is, actions have consequences, and a prudent person incorporates those consequences into their calculations of how much they want to do something. I want to drink beers all night, I don’t want to be hungover tomorrow, so my net desire is to just drink a few beers. I could drink more beers and incorporate hydration and aspirin into my evening plans, or I could drink all night anyway and deal with the consequences tomorrow.

    Getting permits and doing things “the right way” is a strategy to mitigate the consequences you face for your actions. There are alternative strategies, but if you do nothing to mitigate your consequences, you may be unhappy with the result.

    So do what you want, but take precautions or the consequences may outweigh the benefits.