Wonderful!

The fact is that if you’re worried about privacy, you should be far, far more concerned about all the data that various companies are hoovering up about you based on your online activity.

Useless opinion piece saying you shouldn’t worry about this fire because there are bigger fires.

My bad!

This is british english.

This should not be here. It’s a 121 word tweet, at best. A useless rambling of an excuse of an article.

Holy macarolli!! It’s back!

Bullshit clickbait, bullshit article.

Trump is a dumbass. Don’t get down to his level.

Took me a day to come up with something to write down.

Thank you for what you’ve done over the years. I may not have agreed with everything, but you were one of the (very) few who’s opinion I actually cared about.

Thank you for putting a bunch of stuff that has been bothering me - borderline driving me crazy - into words. I miss that skill and it is now clear that this is, in fact, a cesspool we’re all in together.

Such a shame, man. Genuinely. Good luck!

Kurzgesagt has a brilliant, if uncomfortable, video.

It’s a Class A address, reserved for loopback devices. While not any sort of default - yes, it could be used as home :)

I think this might be interesting to test, but development seems to be a bit to quick for production, yet.

Huh TIL. Thought it was cock.

UK is a paper tiger on this.

Thanks for a good chuckle!

Sorry, it’s rare people are not asking for trouble here :)

I mean that any (reasonable) distance travelled at 90km/h will have consumed less fuel than that travelled at 30km/h; given the same car is used, reasonable gear is selected, etc, of course. If there is less fuel consumed, then, naturally, the emissions are lower as well, since that’s just a byproduct of combustion.

While travelling at 90km/h will consume more fuel per unit of time than at 30km/h, the speed increase makes up for that.

No, I’m not.

You’re arguing something else.

It’s a direct correlation. Emissions come from fuel burnt. Less fuel - lower emissions.

Fair enough on the part in bold.

As someone who lives in London, I can say it does come with a caveat - traffic system here are set up by chimpanzees. It makes no sense, none of the three groups - pedestrians, cyclists or drivers - get prioritised. None of the lights are interconnected, so all they bring is annoyance for everyone. I’m an occasional pedestrian, cycling commuter and a (mostly) weekend driver.

TLDR - no wonder the study found that.

I don’t really understand this. Air quality is not affected if it’s electric cars. If it’s about ICE cars - then, in general, efficiency goes up till ~90km/h.

I feel like the limit was lowered for a fake reason and is now suggested to be brought back up for a bad one.