• 35 Posts
  • 14 Comments
Joined 8 months ago
cake
Cake day: March 22nd, 2024

help-circle




















  • I know, this really gets to be splitting hairs about genre definitions. I don’t mind calling Cowboys & Aliens a Weird West movie because it takes place in the Wild West and then goes full-blown scifi. Something about upending a normal Western setting with scifi seems to work for me.

    Yet creating James Bond-esque gadgets using technology that technically existed in the era (steam-power, magnets) doesn’t feel as scifi to me because while the devices are new to the residents, this isn’t “sufficiently advanced technology indistinguishable from magic”. Besides, if we consider James Bond-esque gadgets to be scifi, does that mean the James Bond series itself is scifi? I would’ve said no, but I can see your argument for it.

    In the end, it doesn’t really matter. I just thought it’d be fun to discuss where we define the boundaries of this genre.










  • I played it. Overall, I wanted to like it more than I actually did. The world building was fun but the gameplay was just kinda awkward. I remember the game starts you out with $0 and 0 bullets and then throws you into an ambush. With no bullets and no way to buy bullets, that first battle is unreasonably difficult. Once you actually defeat them, loot their corpses for money, and buy bullets, the game gets better though.

    Also, as an unrelated rant, I don’t like when someone names a specific thing after an entire genre. I have a similar complaint with the TTRPG called “cyberpunk”. You can say Mike Pondsmith created cyberpunk and that’s technically accurate, but it’s also horribly misleading.