I worded it badly, I meant security in terms of arms and ammunition. Basically for quite a while they stopped their weapons being sold to the Ukraine, so basically showing the weapons you buy from them don’t truly belong to you

Switzerland has already proven a few times, that they are neither neutral nor a trustworthy security provider

Honestly (as a software engineer), we should have less of a privileged attitude towards being replaced. In the end, that’s what software engineers have been doing for years regarding other jobs.

But isn’t the investment still driven by consumption in the end? They invest in what makes money, but in the end things people are willing to spend money on make money.

Because they are still chasing a breakthrough. It’s one thing offering LLMs as a service or selling models, it’s another to develop new and better ones. It’s just a huge research cost. I’m pretty sure if they would stop research on new models and slightly increase their prices, they would be profitable. But they don’t want to fall behind.

The gpus will still be used for AI, just not as profitable

Also people speaking your language probably talking better about their own country.

Article says wind speeds are môre steady up there, wouldn’t that mean whatever you put up there is build to withstand those winds?

There is still a ton of locals going there though. Yes it’s a lot of tourists, but a lot of them are also from bavaria

It’s a liter not a glass.

Ist ungefähr wie Festival Camping vom Konsum her.

Finde diese Kommentare die man immer liest bisschen übertrieben, wenn man sich mal die Getränke auf Festivals und co anschaut, zahlt man da fast des gleiche, und da hat man schon eintritt gezahlt.

Wusste ich gar nicht, dass das staatlich ist. Interessant

But the people that already own the game never have to pay that increase, that’s what I mean

Isn’t that how early access works?

Gibt es eigentlich Länder in denen das schon so umgesetzt ist? Würde mich mal interessieren ob das Nachteile hat, z.b. weil die Unternehmen dann anders Einflussnahme betreiben. Aber wäre wahrscheinlich in jedem Fall ein win für die Transparenz

I think they knew that always. It’s just not good for selling the product. That’s the problems with LLMs, they are designed to give you the most likely answer, not the most correct answer, because that’s mich harder to train for.

Imagine you where in their shoes and you do value human life. What would you realistically do? Honest question, I’d like to think I’d do something different then them, but I can not think of a way that does not cut ties completely. I think the best I could do, is secretly support opposition behind the scenes, not sure how much of that is happening though.

Make a new party for which the only policy point is to change the voting system.

Say “vote for us and we change the voting system and the immediately resign and make way for a new vote”.

But the people don’t want that, because they get played against each other.

I think for a lot of them, they don’t agree with most of his policies, but as CEO of such big companies you can not openly oppose him. They would lose a fortune, so instead they try to get the most out of it for their company.

Also, you gotta see it from their view. They are stuck with him now for 3 more years. In 3 years AI will keep getting bigger and may change a lot, loosing those 3 years because of trying to make a stand, might mean lossing your position on the table and your influence on its development completely.

All that said, I’m not saying it’s good that that’s what they are doing, but I can see some strategy in doing it like that