Doesn’t Mbin also support Mastodon?

On Lemmy/Piefed I’ve only ever subscribed to communities.

Lemmy has comically bad integartion with Mastodon. I tried to make a template with some basic rules to only post once, but this approach was no where near close to being viable.

I would stick to topics outside of politics and memes.

“While CRQCs certainly do pose a threat to blockchain-based technologies based on classical ECC algorithms, they are just one of many systems in our modern world that need to transition quickly to PQC,” LaMacchia said, referring to post-quantum cryptography. “Especially when reading some of the policy proposals at the end of the white paper, I am just dumbfounded that Google is focused on policy frameworks for solving problems that seem unique to the cryptocurrency space (e.g., salvaged digital assets) and not the general threat that CRQC pose to all our systems that use public-key cryptography.”

Sounds like they are trying to suck up to the current US administration.

Countries and societies that value liberal democracy and believe in freedom (in the real sense, not the American polemical sense) really need to get rid of all American technology services and platforms.

Is this something like Mbin, but for integrating Threadi and Sharkey/Misskey?

They own Red Hat and IIRC, it’s their fastest growing (if not largest) business unit.

Some thing that I think should be more widely adopted (de facto mostly a list of features that Lemmy lacks relative to Piefed):

• Instance URL redirection; not only a Piefed thing, also done by Voyager
• Merged comments for the same post URL
• Post flair and to a lesser extent tags, Post flair is really helpful for if you manage a community

“Our roles: All Global Engineering roles will evolve. The focus will shift from ‘AI as a tool used on occasion’ to ‘AI automation as a way to scale the delivery of value to customers.’ Our associates’ skillsets will grow as they become proficient in these tools.”

The “scale the delivery of value to customer” phrase is a massive red flag, it means they have no fucking clue what they are doing. If they did, they would be more clear about their thinking and reasoning and not use PR speak.

They do provide some more specifics that are quoted later in the article, but it still sounds like they haven’t really thought this through:

The next few paragraphs of the memo are oddly repetitive. First, it says: “To lead in this era, we must evolve our operating model. The gap we face today isn’t just technical – it’s organizational. Today, we are beginning our transition to an Agentic Software Development Lifecycle (SDLC) to transform how Global Engineering and Products deliver.”

“‘All-in’ product scope: We aren’t looking for a single scrum team to experiment in a vacuum. To avoid bottlenecks, we will move entire products or sub-products to this model simultaneously.” Scrum is a reference to the Agile development model, about which The Register’s Rupert Goodwins expressed reservations back in 2024.

Sounds like a pretty desperate move. One would think subscriptions would come organically.

Enjoy! :)

That’s a fair point.

Still, I think for the median user interested in customisation, a fully vibe coded front end may be overkill.

Why do you need “vibe coding” for UI/UX customisation?

Why can’t you have a regular app that has customisation features (can even use LLM or ML tech)?

I am hardly anti-AI and I’ve vibe coded some small elements of my work projects (very simple modules with extremely clear input -output requirements in a domain I have a lot of business experience in), but this seems like AI for the sake of AI (or hype and PR associated with what is marketed as AI).

Tablets seem like an even more challenging space than smartphones for open devices.

Recently read about the Brax open_slate (pre-orders, supposed to be shipping in late 2026), but it’s a 12" device:

https://liliputing.com/brax-open_slate-hits-indiegogo-for-469-and-up-open-source-privacy-focused-tablet/

Curious what other alternatives people can suggest. I am also looking for a smaller 9" device.

I don’t think they really need inspiration. At least such media brings up interesting question in public discourse.

It looks like he is more into racing sims rather than trucking ones.

GeForce “Rubin” will be built on some variant of the current TSMC 3 nm FinFET node. They need not be the same N3 node that’s in use by Apple, Intel, and others; and NVIDIA might collaborate with TSMC on an exclusive variant just the way it created the NVIDIA 4N node, derived from TSMC N5.

I will speculate power efficiency will be at worst roughly equal to the 5000 series on a SKU class basis (5060 to 6060 and so on), most likely we will see efficiency gains at the SKU class level.

There was a big jump between the 3000 and 4000 series as Nvidia went from Samsung 8 NM to TSMC 4N for the 4000 series.

Both the 4000 and 5000 series were on the same TSMC 4N node.

For the 6000 series we are expecting some sort of new TSMC node (a variant of 3NM), so I would expect efficiency (at the SKU class level) to improve or at worst stay the same.

I am assuming they are saying raster performance will be 30% to 35% higher than the 5000 series.

There is no way raster would be 35% of the performance of the 5000 series.

They don’t even have to come back begging on their knees, the gamers will come to them.

If they were serious about malware, they would have to permanently ban all Meta apps (potentially even blacklist senior Meta executives so apps from other companies would also be banned if they hired the Meta hoodlums).

But again, Google is a large American technology company; i.e. a rat’s nest of crime, lies and degeneracy.

You tested those exact SKUs (Amazon Basics and the other one) or something comparable?

Pretty good, after almost 2 years, !hardware@lemmy.world has regular posters other than me.