i can’t even guess as to why they went quiet. not one guess at all. we will never know.

edit: well they’re not quiet now once they get called out

  • Krauerking
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    18 hours ago

    You don’t listen to others. You are talking past. I’m not even taking it as a personal attack just pointing out you are failing to converse.

    You need to figure out how to talk to people instead of trying to prove you are already right about everything.

    • TheFonz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Also, what does this even mean :

      “If you want to see where the disconnect is happening look at your own responses where you say I disagree” because you want to.

      All I said is I agree with some aspects and disagree with other aspects of your argument. What are you talking about???!!

    • TheFonz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      17 hours ago

      You’re writing walls of text with very supercharged language. Something about this conversation is very triggering for you. You’ve also made it a point to downvote every one of my comments. Cool.

      Could you summarize my position in one sentence so you can demonstrate you understand what I’m saying?

      • Krauerking
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        16 hours ago

        No just the comments where you stopped participating in an active conversation.
        That’s the point of the downvote. Doesn’t add to the conversation and down vote it.

        You totally agree with Harris being a bad choice but think it’s everyone that pointed out that she was a bad choice for making it seem like she was a bad choice for losing. That “nitpicking” policy is not the same as just pointing out the bad policy that won’t be popular among others that don’t say anything and somehow lockstep Republicans are better because you think they don’t have disagreement and we need to copy that idea of lockstep authoritarianism of silencing dissenters to make the DNC win first so that they then can still have bad policy that no one criticizes that you think will then be adjustable.

        Your position subtly changes to whatever you think is right at the moment. I think you truly are a self indulgent individual who thinks themself infallible while not thinking critically but demanding it of others.

        The text is charged because you continue to ignore your own input into creating this conversation and how your own statements have been condescending. You literally ended each comment saying how “I” would soon learn how fast rights could be taken away. A statement I have repeatedly pointed out that you somehow continue to ignore to ask why you are being taken poorly.

        You started with just saying you didn’t agree cause you didn’t want to. And have put all effort in this on me and can’t understand why this makes for bad conversation? Do you ever actually talk to people or talk past them cause you think you are above them? Cause you put all the conversation on me dispel while repeating yourself ad nauseam.

        • TheFonz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Jeesus christ. Your walls of text and runon sentences make it very hard to follow what you are writing.

          You totally agree with Harris being a bad choice but think it’s everyone that pointed out that she was a bad choice for making it seem like she was a bad choice for losing.

          Close but no. There is no discourse happening here and a lot of projection going on from your part. It’s very hard to have a convo when one side makes one point and the other writes a wall of text essay while also calling the other names and insults non stop. I hope you find peace and hapiness wherever you are.

          Cheers