Italy’s parliament on Tuesday approved a law that introduces femicide into the country’s criminal law and punishes it with life in prison.

  • Lembot_0005
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    20
    ·
    6 hours ago

    So instead of tuning the law by adding a few lines about sex-centered homicides, they invented the new term and just stated that some sex is more important than other. It is amazing how politicians manage to invent the most stupid solution to any problem.

    • Kami@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      No need to lose your mind, this is just a new category of hate crime, no sex is more important than the other.

      It is amazing how bigots manage to invent the most stupid excuses to be hateful.

      • falseWhite@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        5 hours ago

        no sex is more important than the other.

        So that means they also have laws for androcide. Right?

        • Kami@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          5 hours ago

          No, because that basically doesn’t exist and usually no one makes laws for things that don’t exist.

          Feel free to keep trying to justify your misogyny, I am mildly entertained.

          • falseWhite@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            5 hours ago

            Would it have been difficult to introduce a gendercide law?

            If androcide doesn’t exist, it wouldn’t matter anyway, right?

            So that you know, all the feminists fighting for equality are satisfied with having equal rights and laws for both genders.

            Unless…

            • Kami@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              5 hours ago

              So you are infuriated by the name? That sounds like misogyny since there are no androcides and the law, whatever the name, would still concern only femicides.

              Anyway a “gendercide” law could be great and could include also hate crimes against homosexuals, transsexuals and so on, but guess what?

              Other bigots like you go completely nuts when someone mentions these words and the current proposed law for that specific type of crimes is blocked.

              • falseWhite@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                5 hours ago

                Infuriated? I see someone is projecting.

                Other bigots like you go completely nuts when someone mentions these words

                Like myself? Uhm. Wasn’t I the one who just said they should have introduced a gendercide law?

                I think it’s time for one of us to take a nap.

                • Kami@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  6
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  5 hours ago

                  Thank you for the eloquent answer 😂

                  EDIT: you are the one who is proposing (completely out of nowhere) a “gendercide” law even though you know androcides don’t exist and even though you didn’t mention other genders.

                  Sounds all purely in bad faith, which is why I’m prone to include you in the bigots club.

                  • snugglesthefalse@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    6
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    4 hours ago

                    Honestly any kind of gender-motivated hate murder should be punished but from my point of view isn’t the biggest issue the murder part? If you’re already sentencing someone for an intentional murder wouldn’t they be ideally getting something resembling a maximum sentence? In which case would the specific motive really make a huge difference in punishment? I’m just trying to understand why this is a big deal when the starting point is already murder.