Likely under the command of law enforcement and without informing any clients.

  • isoA
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Stop the service and inspect the machine for law violations. I’m ok to that. But proxying the network without a notice is literally spying.

    Reverse the case, if a Chinese/Russian provider did this, would you still be OK? It’s funny US and west countries blaming easterns for spying while doing far far more.

    • geekworking@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      The entire term wiretap comes from spying on phone conversations upstream without the target’s knowledge. This is no different.

      China and Russia are 1000% doing this and more to anything hosted anywhere under their jurisdiction. The CCP brags about the Great Firewall.

      I don’t necessarily agree with any of it, but I am pointing out that changing providers to one who wasn’t in the news is not a way to get around government data collection.

      • isoA
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        deleted by creator