• kursis@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think this is very toxic post. I live in apartment in a size of tiny house, and I have no wish to move to suburbs and slave away my life in traffic jams. People should live in a way that they enjoy. Comparing is just a dick measuring contest. And One should be able to enjoy his mega mansion and his huge truck if he wants to too, providing it is done in environmentally safe way and all the taxes (and I mean appropriately and proportionally calculated taxes) are paid

    • Tikiporch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s hard to take this seriously when you shit on living in the suburbs then immediately say “people should live in a way they enjoy”.

      • kursis@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m not shitting on suburbs. I don’t like them though. And I don’t just say “people should live in a way they enjoy”. If you would avoid twisting the words and reading until the end You would notice a whole sentence saying: “And One should be able to enjoy his mega mansion and his huge truck if he wants to too, providing it is done in environmentally safe way and all the taxes (and I mean appropriately and proportionally calculated taxes) are paid”. If, by any chance, you are still reading, let me say that we are free to define the system of living in any way we want. And If you can find a way to do what you like in a way that is safe, constructive and not infringing on our planet and society - go for it!

    • TomJoad@lemmy.tf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Respectfully - I don’t see how mega-mansions and huge-trucks could be considered ‘environmentally safe’.

      And people should also consider the “social-impact of earning”…

      since most mansion-owners “leeched” their money via white-collar jobs at exploitative corporations.

      …In my opinion - the entire downstream effect of our choices must be considered.

      (I write this in the spirit of unified awareness - I know you aren’t pushing for mansions or trucks)

      • kursis@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think You can have a huge house if You build it smart. Like 100 m long earth ship or something like that. I was a bit iffy about trucks though wen I wrote this, so I know what you mean. But if you scale back to normal not Murican size car/truck and go hydrogen or electric, it is still bad, but better than I can realistically hope for with current trends. I agree with your opinion about jobs. I feel that big corporations are allowed too much free space to do what they want. I love to see innovation that big resources can bring, but it is always being overshadowed by their exploitation and lobbying in self interest. There is not enough control and they always end up exploiting their position.

    • Sanity_in_Moderation@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      My smallish place gives me a 10 to 15 minute commute. Which I take do by bicycle frequently. My friends in the suburbs travel 1.5 hours each way. Fuck that shit.

    • Roboticide@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Agreed. One could generously give the OP the benefit of the doubt that the intent of the post is a complaint about the system, but it’s fundamentally flawed as it’s still an attack on the “victim” of said system.

      Who are they, to tell people what to eat or what size house to live in? As long as people have the choice of food they want or home they want, that’s all that matters. Work needs to be done to make those choices equitable, but even in an equitable system there would still be tradeoffs. I just bought a house a few years ago, it’s in town, modest size (1800sq ft), and I have a 15 minute commute. I love it. My friends bought a house last year - huge, 3500 sq ft. Brand new, bit mcmansion-y, but it’s a nice house, and they love it. We paid about the same price, because their house is in the middle of nowhere. If we bought a house near them, I’d have a 1+ hour commute one way each day, and I’d hate it. I like my hobbies, but I don’t need that much space, lol.

      And if someone is happy buying a tiny house, good for them. If someone doesn’t need the space - doesn’t have kids, has undemanding hobbies, isn’t throwing a lot of parties, why would they need a bigger house? It’s just more to maintain. This post is basically saying anyone who doesn’t consume - buying bigger houses and a meat and eggs breakfast - is a victim, which is just stupid. And it’d be great if tiny homes weren’t one of the easiest ways out of the current rental nightmare, but some people would still choose tiny homes even if every house cost the same and renting didn’t exist.

      • kursis@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think You hit a nail on it’s head saying " This post is basically saying anyone who doesn’t consume - buying bigger houses and a meat and eggs breakfast - is a victim, which is just stupid". I agree.