• Aussie_Bob@lemmynsfw.comOPM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yes, it is. MostWAM are well known for using chocolate in their shoots.

    Also, the WAM/Sploshing fetish that this image is a part of strictly does NOT include bodily fluids/scat.

      • Aussie_Bob@lemmynsfw.comOPM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        WAM stands for “Wet and Messy.”

        I’m surprised, you’re in a WAM / Sploshing community, but you don’t know what WAM means?

        All good, here’s some snippets from wikipedia: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wet_and_messy_fetishism

        Wet and messy fetishism (WAM), also known as sploshing, is a form of sexual fetishism whereby a person becomes aroused when copious amounts of a substance are applied to the naked skin, face, or to clothing.

        bodily fluids such as feces, urine, vomit, semen, and female ejaculate is not part of the WAM fetish.

      • Aussie_Bob@lemmynsfw.comOPM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        WAM stands for “Wet and Messy.”

        I’m surprised, you’re in a WAM / Sploshing community, but you don’t know what WAM means?

        All good, here’s some snippets from wikipedia: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wet_and_messy_fetishism

        Wet and messy fetishism (WAM), also known as sploshing, is a form of sexual fetishism whereby a person becomes aroused when copious amounts of a substance are applied to the naked skin, face, or to clothing.

        bodily fluids such as feces, urine, vomit, semen, and female ejaculate is not part of the WAM fetish.

          • Aussie_Bob@lemmynsfw.comOPM
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Possibly because I’m a moderator. All 8 know is on deleted messages I can click the dots button and click view source, which reveals the original post. I’ve got a pretty terrible memory so I probably forgot a few seconds after revealing the source to when I replied.