• Chunk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      21
      ·
      9 months ago

      Okay sorry I think it’s underdeveloped and undeveloped. Primitive, lesser, inferior, etc.

        • Chunk@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          13
          ·
          9 months ago

          Yes, I admit it. I’m not going to play intellectually dishonest games with you or pretend I’m something I’m not.

            • Chunk@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              9 months ago

              We are all flawed. Humans are inherently flawed creatures. I’m sorry you feel like this is a personal attack on you.

              • 0xD@infosec.pub
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                9 months ago

                That’s a convenient excuse for your racism. Fuck off, baseless, revisionist racist.

                • mob@sopuli.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  I’m just reading this and am a bit confused. The dude might be racist or whatever… idk, but wouldn’t a culture that never developed written language be fairly considered “underdeveloped” in modern times?

                  Just a weird thread that turned to name calling super fast, and I’m not sure where that concept is wrong. Unless you believe humanity would be better developed if it devolved backwards to a point that written language didn’t exist?

                  • blindbunny@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    9 months ago

                    You are judging indigenous cultures through a capitalist lens. It’s just not going to look like any of the indigenous people were successful.

                    Native Americans had written languages. They had their own philosophies (men can not “own” land). On the other side of the coin they had wars and genocides but just as the genieva convention exists today they had agreements on how to conduct those things.

                    But it’s so much easier saying the brown people are savages.

                  • 0xD@infosec.pub
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    9 months ago

                    No, because it is not your job, unless you are an expert in the field, to judge whether and how a culture is “developed”, whatever that means.