So I thought The Creator was brilliant. I watched it in the cinema, thoroughly enjoyed it and was gobsmacked when I learned it’s budget was only $79 million. It looks better than some films I’ve seen that cost three times that.

But apparently, while it may make that back, it’s unlikely to even earn $100 million globally.

So the answer to the question of why Hollywood churns out the same shite over and over is that, currently, tragically, that is what the masses want to spend their money on.

And that makes me sad.

  • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Big reason is because people keep buying it.

    Lesser reason is that these companies are risk averse, and would rather spend 500 million risking a flop on a remake of somethign that has an existing base, than spend 10million to support something new, unique and creative.

    • WarmSoda@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      None of this is new. Remakes have been a thing for at least a hundred years.

      Every few years someone reaches an age where they notice it and we get another OP asking the same question that’s been asked countless times.

      • TheMongoose@kbin.socialOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        we get another OP asking the same question that’s been asked countless times.

        I mean, I did answer the question in the post. I’m just sad because people complain that we don’t get enough new stuff, but when that new stuff comes out, they don’t go and see it. I can’t blame Hollywood for playing it safe, when it doesn’t pay off when they don’t.

        • WarmSoda@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Oh definitely. I agree with you.
          It’s like complaining about the weather though.