We’re looking to put together some more detailed rules on what should and should not be submitted to the instance. Things such as, but not exclusively:

  • What types of message you would always like to see removed on sight
  • Whether there are any types of message which should be left up (borderline, with strong corrections from the community)
  • Where the line is drawn on political views (and how gray areas should be treated)

I’ll make no bones: Moderating uk/ukpol has been a learning experience for me.
I’ve learned that there often isn’t much difference between “leaving a comment up because the community has done an excellent job highlighting flaws” and “I should have removed this hours ago, the community shouldn’t have to do this”.
As there isn’t a way to mod-tag a post, inaction on negative posts can reflect badly on the instance as a whole.

Having some clear guidelines/rules will hopefully simplify things.
And more admins should mean that if a report isn’t looked at, someone can review it as an escalation.

I’ve also enabled the slur filters. And we’ll be listening to see if anything needs adding/removing (the template had swearing blocked :| )

So…Answers on a postcard, I guess!

  • Rogue@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    8 months ago

    I think this can be covered by the “no intentionally inflammatory comments/posts” rule that u/flamingos proposed.

    If someone is outright denying facts then they should just be downvoted, reported for trolling, and ignored.

    I don’t engage with the communities you’re referencing so it may be things are worse than I’m aware - but the argument I’ve seen from more prominent members of the communities is that we shouldn’t trust everything provided by the CIA as it is in their interest to demonise enemy states.

    I believe that’s a different opinion from outright denial of historic events so shouldn’t be censored.

    I can’t imagine why these topics would be coming up in UK communities though so hopefully this is an entirely non issue and can be moderated on a community by community basis rather than instance wide.

    • Syldon@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      As much as I like the idea of a trolling report function, it is a very subjective thing to introduce. Some people fall foul of believing the propaganda of their own country, and penalising them for living in a state that does this should not be a thing in my opinion. Ideally you should be convincing people of the truth with irrefutable evidence of the facts.