• Technoguyfication@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s wild to see people in the piracy community of all places have an issue with someone benefiting from data they got online for free.

    • Briongloid@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Many of us are sharing without reward and have strong ethical beliefs regarding for-profit distribution of material versus non-profit sharing.

    • DankMemeMachine@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The difference is that they are profitting from other people’s work and properties, I don’t profit from watching a movie or playing a game for free, I just save some money.

      • Holodeck_Moriarty@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        You do if you make games or movies and those things give you inspiration.

        This is just how learning is done though, whether it’s AI or human.

        • DankMemeMachine@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Absolutely not comparable. Inspiration and an amalgation of everything a LLM consumes are completely different things.

    • arinot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It really isn’t that bonkers. A lot software thought is about licensing. See GPL and Creative Commons and all that stuff thats all about how things can be profited from/responsibilities around it. Benefiting from free data is one thing. Privately profiting at the expense or not sharing the capability/advances that came from it is another. Willing to bet there’s GPL violations via the training sets.

      Is it even possible to attach licenses to text posts on social media?