• jivandabeast@lemmy.browntown.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Points about real stuff hiding in a sea of fake stuff aside, because these ais would likely have been trained on images of real children and potentially real abuse material, each new generated image could be considered a re-exploitation of that child.

    Of course, i don’t think that’s true in a legal sense but definitely in an emotional and moral sense. I mean look at the damage deepfakes have done to the mentals for so many celebrities and other victims, then imagine literally a minor trying to move past one of the most traumatic things that could have happened to them

    • Krauerking
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I really don’t think it would actually be trained on that specific data to be able to create it. If it can figure out a blueberry dog “child naked” seems pretty boring.