• ZoopZeZoop@lemmy.world
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Which is still problematic. If I make a million a year and my fine is 10k, that’s less meaningful to them than 300 is to someone who make 30k per year.

    • EvilBit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      I don’t know the exact proportion but it is meant to be painful but not debilitating no matter your degree of wealth. Yes, it’s fundamentally more consequential to lower incomes, but it’s a hell of a lot better than the system we have in the US.

      Edit: autocorrect

      • ZoopZeZoop@lemmy.world
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        I agree it’s better, but the impact on someone’s life should be the same. Otherwise, you disproportionately target the poor.

        • EvilBit@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 months ago

          That’s the entire point of it being wealth-proportionate. To hit everyone hard enough that it hurts without crushing them.