The 2024 presidential political season is still early, but the hot takes have been atrocious. Among the worst is the notion that President Joe Biden is in trouble because people want an alternative, ...
Like how do you try to win democrat votes by going on Right wing, Far Right, and conspiracy media?
It’s like all RFK thought it would take to win the Presidency is to have the Kennedy last name and be antivaxx, because that’s about all he has to offer other than empty promises of legalized weed.
I don’t align with either party, at all. I don’t like any candidates, and question if I’ll even bother voting.
If I do vote, I would have to determine how much the negatives weigh down positives from any candidate, and I’m not sure yet if RFK’s BS runs too deep for me to stomach, compared to the few benefits he may offer. Those few benefits, though, are among my primary interests. At this point, he seems the best option to push for environmental protections and government transparency.
Is he a loon? Yes, but I firmly believe all of our candidates are severely psychologically imbalanced.
True, and that may be the wrong approach. But from what I gather, he would be incentivizing and subsidizing tech like renewables to make them more attractive to the market. He would also push more litigation towards bad actors.
I’m not convinced that anything else we’re doing or any other plans we have are going to work, so I’m ok with trying a well-managed free market route.
Like how do you try to win democrat votes by going on Right wing, Far Right, and conspiracy media?
It’s like all RFK thought it would take to win the Presidency is to have the Kennedy last name and be antivaxx, because that’s about all he has to offer other than empty promises of legalized weed.
I don’t align with either party, at all. I don’t like any candidates, and question if I’ll even bother voting.
If I do vote, I would have to determine how much the negatives weigh down positives from any candidate, and I’m not sure yet if RFK’s BS runs too deep for me to stomach, compared to the few benefits he may offer. Those few benefits, though, are among my primary interests. At this point, he seems the best option to push for environmental protections and government transparency.
Is he a loon? Yes, but I firmly believe all of our candidates are severely psychologically imbalanced.
His belief is using a free market approach on the environment.
True, and that may be the wrong approach. But from what I gather, he would be incentivizing and subsidizing tech like renewables to make them more attractive to the market. He would also push more litigation towards bad actors.
I’m not convinced that anything else we’re doing or any other plans we have are going to work, so I’m ok with trying a well-managed free market route.