• pulaskiwasright@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    No one said they couldn’t fire roiland because it violates laws. They said he shouldn’t have been fired because of the concept of innocent until proven guilty. That’s separate from the law.

    But the text messages to minors should be enough for anyone to want him fired.

    • XTornado@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Plus firing somebody that then it results it was innocent all along could as be very bad PR. Not in this case since ethere other stuff…

    • Juno@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Is there any good proof about the messages or is it just speculative. If it’s speculative, it’s not enough.

    • QHC@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      What are you talking about? “Innocent until proven guilty” is only relevant from the perspective of the law.

      • pulaskiwasright@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The law isn’t the beginning and end of thought. The law was made because of the principle. It’s not fully encompassing of the principle.