A year away from Election Day 2024, former President Donald Trump is set to testify in a civil fraud trial and separately faces more than 90 criminal charges, setting up the possibility that a convicted felon tops the Republican ticket next November.

But it’s President Joe Biden’s political prospects that are plunging.

In another extraordinary twist to a 2024 campaign season that is more notable for court hearings than treks through early voting states, Trump is expected to be called to the witness stand in New York on Monday. This is hardly typical activity during a post-presidency. But Trump was, after all, the most unconventional president.

  • Endorkend@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    128
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Spencer Weiss, a Pennsylvania voter quoted by The Times who backed Biden in 2020 but now supports Trump, said: “The world is falling apart under Biden.” He added: “I would much rather see somebody that I feel can be a positive role-model leader for the country. But at least I think Trump has his wits about him.”

    Press X to doubt.

      • Telorand@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        46
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        CNN is owned by a right-wing billionaire. They’ve been trending right since Biden took office. They really showed their (new) colors when they did that first softball Trump interview.

        It’s almost definitely propaganda or at least lazy fact-checking that is useful to that end.

      • Socsa@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        The media is literally doing the same shit again. The only thing these polls should ask is “do you value US democracy?” Maybe if we didn’t have a story every fucking morning about how much stupid people care about a three year age difference, more people would be taking this seriously.

      • Tedesche@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        Why does it have to be propaganda? You don’t think some random mook can be that stupid?

        • El Barto@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Sure. But why blast said mook in mainstream media? Why put him on the spotlight when there are much better people out there with better informed opinions?

          That’s like a reporter approaching your local wacko at the corner of the supermarket, asking him a couple of questions, then putting “HITLER DID NOTHING WRONG, according to local wacko” as a headline in all the newspapers the morning after.

          • Tedesche@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            I think you might be vastly underestimating how representative said mook is of the general population.

            • El Barto@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              It doesn’t matter. Just don’t give him a massive media platform to spew his stupidity. Do a survey instead.

              • Tedesche@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Journalists are out there to report, not prevent the spread of stupidity. If a lot of people are stupid, the rest of us should know it.

                Look, in all seriousness, I get your concern, but my point is that journalists don’t have an ethical requirement to silence views many people hold, but you and I find dumb. Quite the opposite, in fact. So, don’t hate the journalist, hate the mooks.

                • El Barto@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  That’s a totally different argument.

                  A journalist can report on an increasing trend om stupidity.

                  It’s questionable to pick one sample and put it in the spotlight, giving it more attention than it deserves.

                  “Man scratched ass and concluded that we’ll all die of butt cancer. More on page 7.”

                  • Tedesche@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    I don’t what to tell you. It’s fairly standard practice to pick someone who you think represents a group to provide readers with a living example of a larger trend. I don’t see anything odd or unusual about this case.

    • Ragdoll X@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      41
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Mr. Weiss, did you already forget about the pandemic and economic crisis that happened under Trump and Biden had to deal with?

    • Midnitte@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      You’d be surprised about people in Pennsylvania.
      Going through Milford close to election night was a surreal experience.