• iquanyin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      1 year ago

      unwanted kids aren’t a good thing, but dead mothers who aren’t treated for ectopic pregnancies and other medical emergencies are even worse. there is no “future kid” there aren’t “potential people” deprived of anything. there are living people and that is who votes and who counts. people as a concept in some dude’s head aren’t real.

      • abigscaryhobo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Came up in a discussion about it yesterday, “The loss of the potential is a shame, but the loss of a reality is worse”. You can argue that fetus is a potential life sure, but to sacrifice an actual in progress life with hopes and dreams is a waste, versus one that currently only knows instinct if anything.

    • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      You do realize not all pro choice folks would choose to do it themselves most of the time right?

      Just because I think someone should be able to get gender affirming care doesn’t mean I only want it so I can get 10 gallon bag mommy milkers.

      It’s called being able to empathize beyond your own horizons.

    • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      If we detect a debilitating birth defect in the third trimester that meant they’d only live for a few hours in pain? Yes. I’m not subjecting my children to torment like that. It’s inhumane and child abuse.

    • TangledHyphae@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Do you really believe that? That future children exist? Why do corn producers not care about all their dead children (seeds) and only care about the corn fields? Did they “abort” those “children”?