- cross-posted to:
- news@dubvee.org
- cross-posted to:
- news@dubvee.org
A Colorado judge on Wednesday heard closing arguments on whether former President Donald Trump is barred from the ballot by a provision of the U.S. Constitution that forbids those who “engaged in insurrection” from holding office.
The hearing came on the heels of two losses elsewhere for advocates who are trying to remove Trump from the ballot under Section Three of the 14th Amendment, which bars from office those who swore an oath to uphold the U.S. Constitution and then “engaged in insurrection” against it. The measure has only been used a handful of times since the period after the Civil War, when it was intended to stop former Confederates from swamping government positions.
Last week, the Minnesota Supreme Court dodged the question of whether the provision applies to Trump, who is so far dominating the Republican presidential primary. It dismissed a lawsuit to toss him off that state’s primary ballot by saying that political parties can allow whomever they want to qualify for primaries.
The court left the door open for a general election challenge if Trump becomes the GOP nominee.
The elections commissions absolutely have the power to determine who gets to appear on the ballot…
The GOP can nominate whoever they want. That doesn’t mean they automatically get to be on the ballot.
Yeah that was a ridiculous cop out. Basically they can’t determine if he’s allowed on the ballot until he’s on the ballot.
Which arguably is the worst scenario for the party itself. Anyone that cares about the Republican Party instead of just Trump would be demanding having clarity about this as soon as possible.
That would require them to care about democracy. They do not. They don’t care if rules are broken or things are unfair. They simply want to seize power, and cannot yet get away with ignoring all the rules to do so. Yet.