• Zozano@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Deliberate misrepresentation can only be employed if one understands the original intent.

    If a malicious person wants to try to convince others “Black Lives Matter” means “only black lives matter”, they may have a pretty clear shot (assuming they’re trying to convince someone Right of Centre).

    If it was rebranded to “Black Lives Matter Too”, then they would have a harder time trying to be deceitful.

    I’m convinced there are more people in the camp of failing to read between the lines.

    In either case, language games are important; playing poorly will lead to catastrophic outcomes. The worst part is this is so easy to correct for - a little bit of imagination will illustrate predictable backlash, or lack thereof.

    • Whoresradish@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Fair enough. My conservative family is on the side of purposefully misunderstanding, but I can understand that some may just misunderstand and we should mitigate that when we can.

      • Zozano@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        God damn, I don’t envy you.

        Having a family which is consciously malicious must make for some very frustrating conversations.

        I, on the other hand, have a right-of-centre family who are mostly just too dull to extrapolate, and spend too much time on FB.

        At least in my case I can sometimes dispel misconceptions.