• Z3k3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    128
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    You know what’s mad. My brother in law on benefits blames other people on different benefits

    • BigFig@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      43
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Disabled veteran relative who gets mad about other disabled people parking in handicap parking…

    • LazyBane@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      This is just the Matrix working as intended.

      Probably a lot of internal shame being projected, and when he gets on his feet he’s probably going to feel guilty for a long time.

      I was on the dole for a while and they do everything to make you feel like a criminal just for needing help. After I started paying taxes again I realised the the unproductive toxicity of my thinking.

      • Z3k3@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        Normally I’d agree with you but he’s been on the bru all his days. Not lazy per say but the second he sees the deduction column of the wage slip he finds excuses to quit.

        When he was diagnosed with osteoarthritis he acted like he hit the jackpot.

        • LillyPip@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Oh yeah, I’ve hit the jackpot, too. Full disability benefits that barely pay for my rent and utilities, but I have to choose between food and meds. All it costs me is constant diarrhoea, vomiting, seizures, fainting, and debilitating pain so I can’t leave the house.

          Totally worth giving up the nearly six-figure career I absolutely adored doing. -.-

          (Sorry, not aimed at you but at your family member and others with that attitude. It’s the opposite of what many of us want, but we have no other choice.)

  • theodewere@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    nothing makes a rich man feel better about himself than watching peasants fight over scraps

  • EvilEyedPanda@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Same as the immigrants aren’t stealing your job, the greedy capitalist are giving those jobs to immigrants to cut down their bottom line, and they love nothing more when you blame the immigrants.

    • just_change_it@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      Immigrants spend less on frivolous bullshit and send money to other countries. Businesses lose out on that end, especially tech companies and wealthy industries.

      Manufacturing and manual labor jobs love immigrants because they can pay them minimum wage for horrible working conditions compared to your typical minimum wage 3rd+ generation white worker.

      • uis@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        3rd+ generation white worker.

        I’m not sure this is how it works. But I don’t live in US.

        • dangblingus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          The answer is a) illegally, or b) the company making use of temporary foreign worker programs. The TFW programs have absurdly little oversight and you can generally treat the workers like chattel slaves.

        • CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Happens in the UK too, widespread enough that my local government employs immigrant workers for below minnimum wage.

  • Pratai@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    11 months ago

    At this point, the people smart enough to understand this- already get it. Those that refuse to accept it- are lost causes.

      • Pratai@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        11 months ago

        Here, nor there. The point remains. There’s no getting through to them. They’re beyond help.

        • ASeriesOfPoorChoices@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          11 months ago

          It is both here and there. It isn’t an argument against your statement. It is saying how what you’ve said is worse than it appears. It is both enhancing and expanding on your comment.

          And you’re trying to start an argument on the internet with someone on your side. 🤦

          Starting to think you might be one of those lost causes.

          • Pratai@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            11 months ago

            It’s an irrelevant point regardless of what side you’re on. I don’t just agree with people because they agree with me. That’s not how it works.

            • ASeriesOfPoorChoices@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              11 months ago

              You: 2+2=4

              Them: yes, definitely four.

              You: FUCK YOU! NO, IT EQUALS FOUR. WHAT ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT, “DEFINITELY FOUR”? HERE, NOR THERE. JUST BECAUSE YOU AGREE WITH ME I’M GOING TO START AN ARGUMENT. I’M NOT GOING TO HAVE THIS CONVERSATION.

              Honestly, this whole thread gets funnier every time I read it.

            • ASeriesOfPoorChoices@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              11 months ago

              Agree about what?

              Are you now suggesting that those people who are lost causes DON’T have the power to vote? What the eff is wrong with you?

              • Pratai@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                11 months ago

                Vote? What the hell are you on about? Listen, when you’re willing to place the goalposts back where they were originally, we’ll continue this discussion. Otherwise…

                I’m out.

                • ASeriesOfPoorChoices@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  “lost causes with the power to vote”

                  That’s the comment you flipped the fuck out about.

                  Also, goalpost moving is a metaphor for when there’s a debate, and one side is attempting to change the winning conditions.

                  Except there is no debate. There’s just you yelling at people for agreeing with you. Those bastards. How dare people be on your side.

        • ASeriesOfPoorChoices@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Have you reread his comment now? Do you understand it yet?

          (By the by, you truncated the expression in your first sentence: “it’s neither here nor there”. Wasn’t sure if you did that on purpose for brevity.)

          • Pratai@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            My point was that them voting is irrelevant. They can be reasoned with.

            • ASeriesOfPoorChoices@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              You specifically said “they are lost causes”.

              NOW YOU’RE ARGUING WITH YOURSELF?!?

              Are you calling yourself a liar, saying they can now “be reasoned with”?? 😂🤣😂

              What the hell is wrong with you? You are so keen to fight, you want to argue with yourself now?!

              This is absolutely amazing.

      • tankplanker@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        Or never think it will ever happen to them so if they aren’t ever going to benefit from it, why should they pay for anybody to have it?

        The perfect example of this is during COVID in the UK when everything locked down and the government implemented furlough payments for all workers using your wage defined by income tax. Lots of self employed are set up as a business and pay the majority of their income as the business with a token amount being actual wages so that they qualify for state benefits like the state pension. This is done to lower their tax bill. Cue loads of self employed moaning that they weren’t getting enough to live on, despite making an intentional choice to pay less tax.

        • TheEighthDoctor@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          Or never think it will ever happen to them so if they aren’t ever going to benefit from it, why should they pay for anybody to have it?

          But I’m in this camp, why should I pay taxes if all I see is a dreadful health system, shit public education system, knowing the social security is bankrupt and will not be able to provide me with a decent retirement, and all the money going into bank bailouts and mismanaged public companies.

          If all I see is the gov mismanaging the funds I give them, why am I not allowed to manage them myself?

          • Guntrigger@feddit.ch
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            11 months ago

            It’s a good point, but it’s the people’s group responsibility to hold those in power accountable for their mismanagement. Voting in different government, protesting, escalating to action, eating them. Maybe in that order.

            If everyone stops paying, you remove the tax and benefits system entirely, and are just left with 100% privatisation. That’s exactly what the rich and priveleged want so they can look after themselves and profit more.

          • tankplanker@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            11 months ago

            The main problem here is that they very much did want to benefit from the state, after intentionally not paying.

            If you are totally prepared and have the money to pay for your own services be they school, health care, police, fire, roads etc. then crack on with it. Vast majority of people rely on at least some of those services during their lifetime, they simply are not rich enough to do this.

    • HowManyNimons@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      I don’t think so. I know otherwise intelligent people who think 40% of beneficiaries are “scroungers” who are “cheating the system” somehow.

      The more we can circulate this message the better: there is still plenty of people who could be brought around.

  • Tau@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    “Benefits” is a grotesque use of the word. Whoever came up with the idea of calling social security “Benefits” is an evil genius.

    • LemmyKnowsBest@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      there’s nothing inherently wrong with the word “benefits” anyway. It’s a positive word. people have come to villianize the word, associating it with those who mooch off the government. But no. benefits are not a bad thing, and people who receive them are not bad people. I agree with the John krasinski meme up there. Rich people are the enemy. poor people are the victims and deserve all the “benefits” they can possibly get.

      edit: changed the word “demonize” to “villainize” which was on the tip of my tongue but it took me two days for the right word to come to me. I’m quite pleased with my brain for finally getting it. That’s why I’m including this loquacious edit.

    • 2deck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      Implies benefits for doing or being able to do no work. Insensitive and inflamatory.

      ‘Welfare’ and ‘income assistance’ are terms more commonly used in Australia.

  • wowwoweowza@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Can we see a version that reads “the rich refusing the pay their fair share…”?

  • HiddenLayer5@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    11 months ago

    And the irony is that “I pulled myself up by my bootstraps” literally used to be an idiom about blatantly lying that you did something impossible before the boomers appropriated it.

  • TheLurker@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    I mean this is not a new thing. This has been how people approach problems for all of recorded history.

  • mdurell@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    I pulled myself up by my bootstraps. Of course, I was privileged enough to actually have boots with straps. It seems fewer and fewer people have these anymore and that’s a damn shame.

  • crystalmerchant@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    11 months ago

    fuck yeah. This is the dumbest shit. Allowing entrenched media structures, virtually always owned by corporate interests, to shape who the boogeyman is. Tip: it’s never the corporate interests who control the entrenched media structures.

  • tsonfeir@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Can grab those bootstraps if you can’t afford boots 🤷‍♂️

  • ParsnipWitch@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    11 months ago

    Sadly, not entirely true. When too many people have to depend on welfare money because rich people demand too much rent and pay too low wages, then everyone will get less.

    But it’s still rich people’s fault so it’s the same picture.

    • Sanyanov@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      11 months ago

      This.

      Technically, welfare is an expense, but, it:

      a)is caused by the economic situation caused by the rich; b)makes people more economically secure, thereby improving, for everyone, the salary negotiating power and ability to build new enterprises, which return money to the economy; c)may save you personally if things turn south. And they always can.

      All that right-wing bullshit about economic freedom and not having to pay for losers has been disproven two centuries ago, yet people prefer to listen to talking heads that will never mention this nuance.