A new court filing has revealed “hundreds of threatening, harassing, disparaging and antisemitic” threats made to Judge Arthur Engoron, who is currently presiding over the civil fraud trial of former President Donald Trump in New York and trying to get the gag order he imposed against Trump reinstated.

Trump already violated Engoron’s gag order twice, costing him $15,000. An appeals court paused the order last week, citing Trump’s “constitutional and statutory rights.” But the threats have caused serious security concerns for Engoron and his staff, especially his principal law clerk Allison Greenfield.

One voicemail, according to an affidavit filed by court officer Captain Charles Hollon, stated: “Trust me. Trust me when I say this. I will come for you. I don’t care. Ain’t nobody gonna stop me either.” Another said: “Resign now, you dirty, treasonous piece of trash snake. We are going to get you and anyone of you dirty, backstabbing, lying, cheating American. You are nothing but a bunch of communists. We are coming to remove you permanently.”

  • Carvex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    87
    ·
    7 months ago

    In 2023, how are these threats not immediately traceable and punished? Even burner phones have to be registered these days, right?

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      39
      ·
      7 months ago

      Considering what happened to the January 6th insurrectionists, even if they’re caught, they’ll get a slap on the wrist.

        • Empricorn@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          I’ll have to find a tracker, but I think most of the insurrectionists received a very mild sentence, if any…

          • baldingpudenda@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            I think the only big punishment for them was taking away their guns since they’re felons now. Though I doubt that will stop them

          • Pratai@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            7 months ago

            That’s not what the conversation is about. The Jan 6th insurrectionists are what we’re talking about.

            • acceptable_pumpkin@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              7 months ago

              Exactly, and who instigated, motivated, and coordinated it all? Where are the Turning Point people with busses to bring folks to DC? What about the congressmen who were tweeting the location of other representatives?

    • Steve@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      39
      ·
      7 months ago

      There is a long history of law enforcement not taking threats of violence seriously, when they come from white conservative groups.

      The Secrete Service might. As far as I know they take all threats to the president as pretty serious. But that only helps the president, not the rest of us.

      • LillyPip@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        7 months ago

        Perhaps in the past, but at least as of a few years ago, the USSS was heavily infiltrated by MAGA fascists.

        Carol Leonnig’s book Zero Fail: The Rise and Fall of the Secret Service goes into great detail on how compromised that organisation has become.

    • eestileib@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      40
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      7 months ago

      The cops and FBI are on their side, that’s why.

      Hell, a decent chunk of the posts are probably from cops.

  • books@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    79
    ·
    7 months ago

    Remember when hrc was lambasted for calling these folks deplorable?

    I always thought she was right and she should doubled down.

        • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          7 months ago

          Well, anyone holding deplorable positions was not going to vote for her, no matter what. All the pearl-clutching tone police seem to overlook that when they lecture her…

          • njm1314@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            Perhaps, but I guarantee you some of them probably weren’t going to vote at all until she said it. Spite inspires a lot of weirdos. I think we’ve all learned that by now.

    • WaxedWookie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 months ago

      Unfortunately, being right doesn’t matter in a popularity contest.

      I do wonder how things would have panned out if she’d won - I can’t help but think Trump would have been replaced by someone better able to overthrow democracy…

  • Pratai@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    7 months ago

    Anyone else remember back in 2020 when the conservative bullshit spewing machine (Fox News) was saying how democrats weren’t going to be able to accept the outcome of the election and that conservatives handle these things with dignity and maturity?

    • TechyDad@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      7 months ago

      They also tried claiming that Trump not accepting the election results was fine because Hillary didn’t accept the results in 2016. This despite definitive proof that Hillary conceded that night. But they can’t let something as pesky and minor as facts get in the way of their talking points.

      • Fades@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        7 months ago

        Yeah they just lie, it’s not like the morons will fact check and even if they do stumble upon the truth it defaults to lib conspiracy.

        Any conservative who hasn’t walked away from Trump and/or the federalist society never will. They are lost.

  • Sanctus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Its whack how we have a whole ass terror cell in our government nobody does anything about.

  • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    7 months ago

    I hope they are doing their best to track each one of these terrorists down and throwing the book at them. All the better to have these thugs wrapped up in the justice system with trials, prison time, etc…give them something to occupy their time, esp. if some other big event calls them (like J6), they can stay away due to serving time or having to show up to trial, etc…

    • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      I hope they are doing their best to track each one of these terrorists down and throwing the book at them.

      I’m sure justice will be as swift and harsh as it was for the January 6 insurrectionists. Which is to say, they’ll slow walk it and hand out insultingly minor sentences when they absolutely have to do anything at all.

      • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        7 months ago

        I sure hope they start taking this all very seriously before the orange blob (or a proxy) is able to seize power.

      • Madison420@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        FBI is part of it but the us Marshalls oversee Federal courts, they’re not super politically biased and will fuck some people up if given a reason. Don’t fuck with the federal Marshall service.

  • Vant@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    7 months ago

    From the moment he was put on this case he knew his life as he previously knew it was over. He knew this was coming. Trump and his followers want to destroy the world if it refuses to conform to their wishes.

  • Schwim Dandy@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    7 months ago

    I highly doubt these mental midgets took care to properly hide their identity when making these calls. I’m fairly confident they could easily be round up and charged with criminal threats against an officer of the law.

  • Syrc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    7 months ago

    Trump already violated Engoron’s gag order twice, costing him $15,000.

    I gagged. That’s less than the cheapest car on the market. For violating two gag orders in a civil fraud trial.

  • JeffKerman1999@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    I mean, his rights? Isn’t the point of the judicial system to strip away some rights when you do something illegal?

    • originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      in this case its all about the drawn out appeal. trumps famous not for winning, but for dragging cases out so long it doesnt matter anymore.

      in this case, hes already guilty hes just literally throwing tantrums to create noise that might allow for an appeal. and its a longshot, as no one appears to be giving him an inch of appealable activity.

      its painful to watch, but its all about the appeal avoidance.

  • trash80@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    7 months ago

    Is there some sort of strategy the court is adhering to that would explain why Trump hasn’t been charged with (or is it “held in”?) contempt?

    • PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      7 months ago

      The court is bending over backwards to avoid looking biased. The only way you can appeal a trial is on the basis of a mistrial. Basically, you need to argue that the trial was unfair in some way. And the court really doesn’t want that, because if he’s able to appeal all the way up the chain to the SCOTUS, they’ll let him walk. So they’re avoiding taking any actions against him, because they don’t want to appear biased against him.

      • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        It could be the most airtight ruling and fair trial in the existence of human kind and he would still appeal, and he’d force the appeals court to hear it by having bought some of them, and then he’d appeal that to the SC, who’d let him off because he owns it.

    • cybersandwich@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      I think everyone is missing the biggest one. Trump will lose his businesses. He can’t “win” here. So he’s trying to provoke the judge into doing something stupid so he can appeal and delay and appeal.

      The judge isn’t going to be manipulated into that.

      You guys can be mad about it but this is the long game and imo the right move.

    • Furbag@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 months ago

      The leading theory on that is that the judges currently assigned to Trump’s legal cases are going to extremes to avoid being labeled as “biased” so that they can avoid a potential mistrial, which seems to be Trump’s goal at this point in lieu of an actual defense.

      I’m not so sure that’s the case, seeing as Trump has been treated with the kid gloves the entire time and yet he is still throwing sucker punches at every opportunity he gets. They would have had every right to be heavy-handed with his treatment considering his threatening language. I think it has more to do with the fact that the case is unmistakably political by virtue of the fact that it involves a former president and the judges want to be extra careful to not incite Trump’s mob to take violent action against themselves or their court staff.

    • idiomaddict@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      7 months ago

      Did I miss some context or is that just casually suggesting that other races are more violent?

      • deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        The implication is that violence by white people is tolerated more than violence by non-white people.

      • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        Ελληνικά
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        7 months ago

        Missed context.

        White people are typically given an extreme benefit of doubt that is not afforded to other racial demographics in the US.

        • WaxedWookie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          7 months ago

          Also, the people making the violent threats are exactly the type to say that other races are more violent 13/50 and all that.

      • be_excellent_to_each_other@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        I know others have explained already, but here it is in photographic form.

        Remember when like 20 cops were all that were available to keep the Jan 06 insurrectionists out of the Capital Building?

        Here’s what DC looked like during the BLM protests:

        • idiomaddict@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          Honestly, it was that everyone else read it sarcastically and I didn’t. I’m autistic though, so that’s not new. Also your picture didn’t load, but I’ve been to enough protests to know how the police handle things

      • mateomaui@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Possibly also that the average white person has a tendency to issue idle threats that they aren’t motivated enough to deliver on. Armchair terrorism. Get me a beer.