or maybe more general #Fediverse crowd: Given some communication over here recently, I wonder whether it’s possible to compose posts that are visible to followers only but for which _each_ of my follower is able to see each response and able to interact with each other person responding there no matter whether these people follow each other too?

  • hoergen@horche.demkontinuum.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    @z428 look, if you want all the contacts just to be able to answer each other or see each others answers, you have to tell every server and other user who is allowed and should see the answer of every other participant.

    So you have to technically group and share this “virtual group with all participants” to everybody else in the group. Otherwise nobody knows who to send replies, except to you.

    Even this might be possible in other protocols, you have to trust every other involved node, that it respects your intention to privacy and keep the closed list that you set initially.

    • z428@loma.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      @hoergen Hmmm, maybe I’m all off here, but … this somehow feels like a problem that has been solved in the past, and be that as simple as in e-mail: Sending messages to a wide load of recipients with all of them in Cc (because I want to discuss issues with all of them), anyone who responds to any of these messages will send this response to all of the original recipients, and that is intentionally and expected to be this way. If someone modifies the set of recipients - fine, of course everyone’s able and allowed to do that, that’s a conscious decision, but it’s not, like “no matter what - your response will only be seen by those people in that recipient list that have you in their address book”… . Maybe this analogy is a bit difficult, but at least that’s a kind of behaviour that, for an addressing as generic as “Following”, would somehow be not all too much off.