Grazie per i link.

People need to keep in mind that assuming no CLA was signed, code was contributed under GPL. this means that only tibbi’s code and whoever else was part of the deal, has been sold, the project is still GPL licenced, and unless every GPL contributor agrees with a license change, they cannot change it from GPL without it being a violation.

Questo sembra confermare la mia ipotesi, quindi dipende tutto dalla percentuale di contribuitori al codice. Questo e’ anche un interessante esempio di come le CLA ( contributor license agreement) che chiedono ai contributori di cedere preventivamente la proprieta’ dei loro contributi siano una pessima pratica