Ok. Not sure losing 20 years to a court basing ideas on such things is any better. Seems even 20 years ago a defence would be able to provide diverging experts. 20 years ago genetics was fairly well understood even if we know more now. The idea of a family having a common issue was fully expetlcted in the 1990s let alone 2000.
As a anacdotal example. My family surrers from an eye condition. Thar was believed to be the result of a period of illness in my father i. The 70s
My brother had it from 10 and my more recently.
It was about 1990 rhat the experts started to recognise ot was a genetic conditio. Carried by all males. So the time this woman was jailed. The ideas had been well known in science for iver 10 years. Someone would have been able to provide expert witness doubting the paediatric ideals.
But lets be honest. Much of the US laws being instituted in firced borth states is based on similar unsupported ideals)
Ok. Not sure losing 20 years to a court basing ideas on such things is any better. Seems even 20 years ago a defence would be able to provide diverging experts. 20 years ago genetics was fairly well understood even if we know more now. The idea of a family having a common issue was fully expetlcted in the 1990s let alone 2000.
As a anacdotal example. My family surrers from an eye condition. Thar was believed to be the result of a period of illness in my father i. The 70s
My brother had it from 10 and my more recently.
It was about 1990 rhat the experts started to recognise ot was a genetic conditio. Carried by all males. So the time this woman was jailed. The ideas had been well known in science for iver 10 years. Someone would have been able to provide expert witness doubting the paediatric ideals.
But lets be honest. Much of the US laws being instituted in firced borth states is based on similar unsupported ideals)