• ApeNo1@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    11 months ago

    Genuinely curious. Why are subjective field sobriety tests still done in the US versus roadside saliva drug tests or breathalysers for alcohol.

    • KISSmyOS@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      11 months ago

      Same reason why “open container laws” are a thing, where you can be found guilty for a DUI even if you didn’t drink anything, if they find an opened alcoholic beverage in your car.
      Or why they can bust you for DUI when you were not driving but just sleeping in your car.
      Because it’s one of the tools of law makers and police to criminalize as many people as possible and use selective enforcement to punish certain groups.

    • Drusas@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Saliva would require a warrant, but they can require a breathalyzer test without a warrant. Breathalyzers need to be regularly calibrated, so it could partly be laziness in that regard. But I’m pretty sure it’s mostly because they want to prove you are not safe to drive regardless of your blood alcohol content. The longer the stop, the more opportunity there is to find something against you.