• CapeWearingAeroplane@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    That’s exactly your problem. You understood that they had no ill intentions, but you still had to spend time badgering them and going after them to prove a point.

    You could have chosen to interpret their post in a way that didn’t offend you, but you chose to get offended, and then you try to make them look like the asshole for not bending over backwards when you “hurt yourself in your confusion”.

    • Ook the Librarian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      I never said I was offended. I said the language vilifies people will mental illnesses.

      I don’t know why it is inappropriate to try to prove a point. And no, I don’t know they had no ill intentions. I was hoping that the language was inadvertently hurtful. After the discussion, I honestly feel that the other party does in fact harbor some toxic views of people who are mentally ill. I was hurt in disappointment, not confusion. I was confused why one couldn’t disavow something so simple. I don’t know if I’d rather have the confusion or disappointment.

      I’m not choosing an interpretation either. Do you know what was said?