tardigrada@beehaw.org to Technology@beehaw.org · 6 months agoSubstack says it will not remove or demonetize Nazi contentwww.theverge.comexternal-linkmessage-square95fedilinkarrow-up1201arrow-down10cross-posted to: ghazi@lemmy.blahaj.zonetechnology@lemmy.world
arrow-up1201arrow-down1external-linkSubstack says it will not remove or demonetize Nazi contentwww.theverge.comtardigrada@beehaw.org to Technology@beehaw.org · 6 months agomessage-square95fedilinkcross-posted to: ghazi@lemmy.blahaj.zonetechnology@lemmy.world
minus-squareFlumPHP@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up41·6 months agoIt’s also disingenuous because they already decline to host sex workers newsletters. So if the censorship angle was true, they’re already censoring.
minus-squarePotentiallyAnApricot@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up16·6 months agoRIGHT. Thank you for pointing this out. :::
minus-squareintensely_human@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·6 months agoRight, and if the profit motive angle were true, they’re already violating that by censoring the sex workers you just mentioned. So that eliminates profit as the reason for their actions here
It’s also disingenuous because they already decline to host sex workers newsletters. So if the censorship angle was true, they’re already censoring.
RIGHT. Thank you for pointing this out.
:::
Right, and if the profit motive angle were true, they’re already violating that by censoring the sex workers you just mentioned.
So that eliminates profit as the reason for their actions here