The Picard Maneuver@startrek.website to hmmm@lemmy.world · 2 年前Hmmmstartrek.websiteimagemessage-square30linkfedilinkarrow-up1178arrow-down12
arrow-up1176arrow-down1imageHmmmstartrek.websiteThe Picard Maneuver@startrek.website to hmmm@lemmy.world · 2 年前message-square30linkfedilink
minus-squareDocMcStuffin@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up33·2 年前Pretty sure that violates at least one building code. What country was this from?
minus-squareThe Picard Maneuver@startrek.websiteOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up30·2 年前I found it under a post where people were talking about living in NYC.
minus-squareniktemadur@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·2 年前Surely built before NYC had fire codes. In that case, do some buildings with “historical value” somehow get grandfathered in?
minus-squarePrinceali311@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up6·2 年前Yeah, at least in most cases. They get labeled as “legal non-conforming” and usually are required to become conforming in the event there is any major reconstruction done to fix a casualty event.
minus-squarePrinceali311@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up4·2 年前My first NYC apartment wasn’t this tight, but it wasn’t a shit ton different either.
minus-squaresenkora@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkarrow-up3·2 年前I’ve seen buildings like this in the West Village.
Pretty sure that violates at least one building code.
What country was this from?
I found it under a post where people were talking about living in NYC.
It’s absolutely against nyc fire codes
Surely built before NYC had fire codes. In that case, do some buildings with “historical value” somehow get grandfathered in?
Yeah, at least in most cases. They get labeled as “legal non-conforming” and usually are required to become conforming in the event there is any major reconstruction done to fix a casualty event.
Yikes!
My first NYC apartment wasn’t this tight, but it wasn’t a shit ton different either.
I’ve seen buildings like this in the West Village.