I like most of these arguments, and I can easily agree on security (but that’s as easy as acknowledging how centralized staking has been). But there is no statistical evidence regarding the environmental “debunk.” GPUs being reused for other uses is not a slam. If anything, more uses would mean if existing hardware didn’t exist more would be created AND use the same energy. As for MEV, he has no stats for how much was done prior to merge, thus to way to prove. I’d been hearing about the Dark Forest long before the Merge. A technological advance on MEV could fix regardless of PoS or PoW–or it can fail regardless (looking at you PoH Solana https://www.coindesk.com/tech/2023/02/24/for-solana-users-priority-fees-mean-paying-up-to-skip-the-line/ - nail in the coffin for me as killing MEV was my main hope for the chain). No stats = weaker argument. It definitely should require weasel words, not absolutes, like environmental impact is definitely not better with PoS. Again, the arguments on security and profitability are fine.