• Hello_there@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    10 months ago

    Because NH got their panties in a twist and decided that their miniscule state needs to be first? They can go fuck off.

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      30
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Nope.

      Because there wasn’t enough time for NH to change their state law…

      DNC and Biden got so mad a state wouldn’t violate state law to help him in an election, they stripped the state of their say in who the candidate was. And it’s a total coincidence he got his ass kicked there last primary…

      But it’s cool, because he legitimately is still better than trump, and even though that difference keeps shrinking, no one is allowed to complain about Biden because trump exists…

      • Telodzrum@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        Because there wasn’t enough time for NH to change their state law

        They had a year’s notice. The rulemaking process began last winter.

        • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          10 months ago

          Do you think the leaders of the state democratic party are in complete control of the laws in NH?

          I’d think of all people, Biden wouldnt expect politicians to rush into anything…

          Or anyone to ever change a politicians mind on how to vote.

          • Telodzrum@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            They had adequate notice. The state cannot cling to an imagined relevancy and hold a party hostage. The legislature chose not to act and therefore their constituents don’t get to participate in the Democratic Primary.

            Seems pretty straightforward to me.

            • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              11
              ·
              10 months ago

              Seems pretty straightforward to me

              Republicans say that about all kinds of crazy rationalizations

              Most people who are against democracy feel like democracy isn’t very important as long as their team wins in fact.

              But I’ve found engaging with that type of people is rarely productive, regardless of what they consider their team.

      • 𝔇𝔦𝔬
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        26
        ·
        10 months ago

        You’re shouting in to a screeching void, haha. These degenerate buffoons don’t care, or want, the truth and figure the down vote arrow is a sword and that it actually deters you.

        • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          18
          ·
          10 months ago

          It turns out 30 years of dragging the Democratic party to the left lost us as many voters as we gained, and now a bunch of “Democrats” act a lot like Republicans and share the same morals…

          What’s crazy is if they had stayed active in the Republican party, they could have actually kept the Republicans somewhat moderate.

          Instead them leaving just concentrated the crazy, and turned 1/3 of the country away from voting.

          The only ones that won from Dems courting Republican voters was conservative extremists. Everyone else lost.