• null@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Not to consume it at all, obviously.

    Your measurement for converting potential revenue into loss hinges on those being the only 2 options.

    • Zoolander@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      I have pointed that out as a possibility. Not consuming it at all, though, is not theft precisely because the person isn’t consuming it.

      • null@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        In which case piracy only accounts for lost revenue if and only if the pirate would have 100%, guaranteed, purchased the content if a pirates copy was not available. So your calculation does not work.

        • Zoolander@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          if a pirates copy was not available.

          This is exactly why my calculation does work. If a pirated copy was not available, they wouldn’t be able to consume the media without paying for it.

          • null@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            But they also wouldn’t have to pay for it. Which is the only way your calculation would work.