• Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Except there is the same amount of Earth that was before & even less biodiversity & (wild) biomass.

    Any increase in environment effects like that (even a local level) by a single species would be considered an infestation.

    • Steve@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      You sure can make the case that humans are an invasive species, but the fact is that we are the overwhelmingly dominant species on this planet, so it is what it is.

      • BaumGeist@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        5 months ago

        There’s a lower limit of 20 quadrillion ants on earth, so I’d say their species(es) are dominating us. Don’t even get me started on bacteria, they’re just puppeting us for their own benefit. I think even chickens are like 3:1 with humans.

        Maybe by technology though, we definitely have the best cars, guns and microplastic.

        • Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 months ago

          No, every other animal, bacteria, fungi, plans, aliens that visited earth, have microplastics in them as well. It will probably remain a forever mystery how it all got everywhere.

          The current planetary events will be marked by a distinctive line of plastics in the sediment rock (the ‘F-U boundary’ as the future crab historians will be calling it).

      • Nudding@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        Hopefully we fuck it enough to permanently delete us. It will take millions of years, but the biosphere will recover eventually.

      • Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Yes, but dominant (especially “intelligent”) does not need to mean destructive. Nor to multiply beyond sustainable levels (ie until we hit hard walls, at the end of the current extinction event).