And so it begins. Nine months still to go before the next US presidential election and already the Republican party favourite and former President Donald Trump is sending eyes rolling skywards with his seemingly outlandish statements.

And yet they will delight many of his supporters.

Suggesting at a rally in South Carolina that he would “encourage” aggressors (for example Russia) “to do whatever the hell they want” with Nato countries that fail to pay their dues has prompted an immediate slap down from the White House. A spokesman called the comment “appalling and unhinged”, saying it was “encouraging invasions of our closest allies by murderous regimes”.

Nato Secretary-general Jens Stoltenberg has also responded forcefully, saying: “Any suggestion that allies will not defend each other undermines all of our security, including that of the US, and puts American and European soldiers at increased risk.”

    • Wahots@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Vote. Get all your friends and family to vote. Four more years should buy us enough time while his power is waning.

      If there was ever an election that was important to vote and be clear-eyed in, it’s this one.

    • FaceDeer@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      5 months ago

      The US doesn’t run the world, and is having less influence every year at this point. Society will pull through.

      • Dozzi92@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        The US military’s influence throughout the world is as strong as ever, and Trump is 100% on board with reducing its presence worldwide. I don’t necessarily disagree with it, but global trade will take a massive hit out of the gate, not to mention the more obvious issues with Russia, Israel, etc. But hey, Trump has been critical of Israel lately.

        • FaceDeer@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          I’m not saying it won’t be a negative outcome. I’m saying society will survive.

          • wanderingmagus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            I mean if you’re gonna be technical, “society” will literally survive a nuclear exchange and total civilizational collapse. As long as there’s more than one person and those people aren’t killing each other (or even if they are), there’s “society”.