I understand when people speak about the ethical problems with eating meat, but I think they do not apply to fish.

  • Alue42@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    OP didn’t specify commercial fishing. What about traditional fishing practices, or a singular fisher catching for himself/family?

    • Zarxrax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      10 months ago

      Commercial fishing just makes it happen at scale a lot more efficiently. If every person who ate fish was out there fishing for themselves, I would imagine it would be a significantly larger impact than the commercial fishing.

      • Alue42@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        10 months ago

        You are deliberately not answering the question.

        “If every person that ate fish was out there…” exactly - they purchase fish caught commercially because either they don’t know how to catch their own fish or they don’t have access to catch their own fish (access either with time, money, or physically). Commercial fishing solves that by precisely doing it “at scale a lot more efficiently” as you pointed out and ships the fish to where people will purchase it.

        I didn’t ask “what if everyone went out and did it themselves”

        I asked your thoughts on people who DO fish for themselves, or those using traditional fishing practices.

    • livus@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      @Alue42 but that then still maps closely onto the ethical issues around meat-eating per se versus eating the products of commercial meat production.

      Which makes eating fish no different to eating other kinds of meat in terms of the ethics.