Jenoki@lemmy.ml to Piracy@lemmy.mlEnglish · 4 months agoThis is the waylemmy.mlimagemessage-square51fedilinkarrow-up1116arrow-down139
arrow-up177arrow-down1imageThis is the waylemmy.mlJenoki@lemmy.ml to Piracy@lemmy.mlEnglish · 4 months agomessage-square51fedilink
minus-squareZeroEcks@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up20arrow-down1·4 months agoSometimes you need to seed back more than 200% because the other two people might not be able to seed it back. I would generally not set a limit
minus-squareRustmilian@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down5·edit-24 months agoTrue, but as a minimum you should be doing 200%. Also in a ideal scenario that 200% would be spread out to a lot more people then just 2.
minus-squarelittleblue✨@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6arrow-down5·4 months agoOP is showing 200% as their maximum. That’s the whole point of this thread. 🤌🏼
minus-squareRustmilian@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down3·4 months agoNo shit Sherlock 🫴
minus-squarelittleblue✨@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down5·4 months agoI’m not the one reiterating the salient point of a very short thread. Might do well to read that to yourself instead, friendo. 🤗
minus-squareRustmilian@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down6·edit-24 months agoI have no time for children.
Sometimes you need to seed back more than 200% because the other two people might not be able to seed it back. I would generally not set a limit
True, but as a minimum you should be doing 200%.
Also in a ideal scenario that 200% would be spread out to a lot more people then just 2.
OP is showing 200% as their maximum. That’s the whole point of this thread. 🤌🏼
No shit Sherlock 🫴
I’m not the one reiterating the salient point of a very short thread. Might do well to read that to yourself instead, friendo. 🤗
I have no time for children.