I personally am quite against it. I joined Lemmy to stay away from the toxicity on Meta’s platforms. I don’t want any corporate bodies on the fediverse either and possibly doing to the fediverse what Google did to XMPP

  • grady77@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I mean isn’t that the beauty of it? You don’t have to subscribe to anything meta and you can join servers that actively block it. I think it’s a good thing if it gets more users on activity pub so our communities can thrive.

    • spaduf@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I think you are lost. This is an instance meta where that discussion is being had. We are discussing lemmy.blahaj.zone

    • zib@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      In an ideal world, I would agree with this, but as OP mentioned, the worry is they’ll do something similar to what Google did with XMPP. Meta starts adding non-standard features and extensions to activity pub, grows their platform to the point where all other instances are forced to adopt the same standard, then they defederate to close off the ecosystem, making them the only option for many to stay connected. I feel like the only way to not fall into that trap is to either not bother copying whatever proprietary stuff they add right from the start or not federate with them to begin with. If there are alternatives I’m not considering, I would love to hear them.