• BastingChemina@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    1 year ago

    Why did we talk so much about James Webb and I’m only discovering about this telescope now ?

    A telescope designed for dark energy !

    • paris@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      1 year ago

      At least part of it is that NASA is good at marketing. They make cool shit and hype up the public so we all know how cool it is too. Soon they’ll be launching a NASA+ streaming service that’s completely free. All their video and live content in one place. They’re genuinely one of the coolest public entities I know about, and part of why I know about them is because they’re so good at marketing their projects to the lay public.

    • tal@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Why did we talk so much about James Webb

      At least on /r/europe on Reddit, I think because it was being launched by a European rocket from a European spaceport, so there was a lot of discussion about Arianne. The scope was extremely expensive, so rebuilding it probably wouldn’t be an option, and Arianne 5 was a particularly reliable launch platform.

      Amusingly, this new Euclid scope is the mirror opposite of JWST: a principally-European scope launched by an American rocket from an American spaceport.

    • ProcurementCat@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      45
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s a lot less when you consider that it took 10 years to develop, build and launch that thing. That’s 10 years of wages for technicians, scientists, programmers and all the associated jobs - secretaries, cleaning staff etc.

      And that’s the beauty of funding science: the money goes straight back into the economic cycle and also funds the training and education of the young scientists who are learning the ropes. This thing has funded probably dozens of PhD’s and hundreds of master students.

    • tal@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      That’s a hell of a lot of money for a single telescope.

      I mean, right here you can see telescopes being sold for $49.99 on Amazon. It makes one question the entire budgetary process behind this Euclid scope.

      EDIT: Not to mention that the Amazon one comes with a tripod, and as best I can tell from this article and Wikipedia, the Euclid scope doesn’t have anything of the sort. If we could get Josef Aschbacher here right now, I think that the no-tripod issue would definitely be an incisive question to raise with him.