• DocMcStuffin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    151
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    That headline is a bait and switch.

    One of the major nuclear research facilities belonging to the Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation (ANSTO)’s is installing a major rooftop solar system that will save $2 million.

    • Skua@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      104
      ·
      4 months ago

      To be honest even if it was a power plant… they’re already in the business of generating power. If generating more clean power in the same space is an option, that sounds great

      • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        30
        ·
        4 months ago

        Yeah, and nuclear reactors use a lot of electrical power anyway. When they’re first starting they need to draw a lot from the grid and they all have powerful backup generators and battery banks to keep the systems online in the event they need to suddenly shutdown the reactor.

        The implausible thing would actually be getting approval to put the panels up, since reactors have high standards for checking the consequences of different materials being used on-site.

    • wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      4 months ago

      Although, why the fuck are we not plastering those giant nuclear vent thingies (the technical term) with solar panels? Or really any surface that can support them?

      • pizzazz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        4 months ago

        Because solar panel efficiency is already pretty low so it’s best to put them in the areas and in the orientation in which they will receive the most light

      • BadlyDrawnRhino @aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        4 months ago

        At least here in Australia, we believe in the right for a select group of billionaires to make money off the land in the form of coal mining, and renewable energy threatens that right.

        Now that the world is turning away from coal as much as possible, we’re now pivoting to allow a select group of billionaires to make money off the land in the form of uranium mining, and renewable energy also threatens that.

    • Zorque@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Because you can’t have two different sources of energy! It’s antithetical to existence! Only one thing can ever exist or chaos reigns.

      • slevinkelevra@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        In bavaria they made exactly this. You have a “Vorzugsgebiet” (loosely translated area of favourited power accumulation) for either wind or solar. Some people then had the outrageous idea of setting up a wind turbine in the middle of a solar park. Guess what happened? It wasn’t approved because it was only allowed to build a solar park there. You can’t make this stuff up. That’s German bureaucracy for you.

    • BadlyDrawnRhino @aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 months ago

      For context, the conservative party here in Aus is pushing hard for a transition to nuclear power, rather than renewables.

    • Shiggles@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      They’re in Australia, they’re obviously already connected to the electrical grid, and have the free space. I don’t really see how taking advantage of an obviously free win is in any way a “sick burn” of nuclear.