• bbuez@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Im pretty sure the headline I just read has “Biden” and “Isreal” and “Genocide”

    • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      19
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      They’re still pleading for people to vote for Biden while Biden is actively supplying weapons for the Genocide and not doing anything to stop the Genocide.

      Don’t get me wrong, I’m fine with this rethoric after the Genocide ends. But not while Biden is actively complicit.

      • bbuez@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        9 months ago

        Goalposts… she should wait until the genocide ends to criticize Biden over his response? The rhetoric is that he should end complacency in relations with Israel

        • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          14
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          She should certainly not endorse Biden while he is still actively complicit in Genocide. Nobody should.

          • bbuez@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            Well who would you endorse? Nobody? With an incumbent Democrat and for party optics, would you want to go into the next election unorganized? Especially if you can actually influence policy before and after re-election. How is open pressure to change policy not good enough? If its not effective you don’t stop pushing. We have already seen the alternative; you arent going to get that with a trump presidency, and he has been clear on his policy regarding Palestinian.

            For us, as voters, undecided is by the best that we can do, and honestly voice to our Democratic representatives that this needs to change