• JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    If we’re going here…

    Whitelist isn’t the preferred nomenclature. Use terms like allow-list or permit-list.

      • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Usually a deny-list or a block-list.

        These are the inclusive terms that are getting adopted in IT, at least, and they usually work in that context. Maybe not for everything.

          • quaternaut@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            At my company, white hat hackers are to be called “offensive security researchers”. Black hat hackers are to be called “attackers”.

          • DEADBEEF@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 months ago

            Don’t forget about the whole master/slave thing or how often programmers kill children.

          • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            I think grey still is acceptable, at least until the martians start demanding equal rights.

            I think terms like “legal grey area” don’t have the same connotations as black/white do, because “grey” isn’t really used as an adjective for a person.

            I still refer to our oldschool Linux admins as greybeards. I think that’s okay because there’s like 5 oldschool female Linux admins in the world and they are chill as hell.