Let’s reinvent java bytecode but… different

  • onlinepersona@programming.devOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    22
    ·
    3 months ago

    I’m not sure why the WASM creator(s) didn’t take advantage of the existing java bytecode and JVM instead of reimplementing it. Might’ve sped up its adoption. Doesn’t matter to me though, as long as JS stops being the #1 in web development.

    This meme isn’t to be taken seriously

    Anti Commercial AI thingy

    CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

    • xigoi@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Java bytecode is designed specifically for class-oriented languages like Java and works terribly with anything else.

    • RonSijm@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Why would they? WASM is Web-Assembly, so Assembly is a lower level language than Java.

      You can use C# WASM through Blazor, and Java WASM though JWebAssembly. WASM as core is supposed to be language agnostic. So If you want a JVM in WASM you can build it on top of it