It’s not about the destination, it’s about the journey.

  • Hovenko@iusearchlinux.fyi
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    7 months ago

    With gentoo and arch you are learning how linux works. Replace nixos with salt or ansible and it can even get you a job.

    • 2xsaiko@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 months ago

      NixOS is still a Linux system, and the configuration still translates to stuff you have in a very similar way on every other Linux system too (with the exception of what’s needed for the file system layout to work). It’s not some kind of magic. I’ve probably learned as much stuff applicable to general Linux distributions as while using Arch and Gentoo.

      Of course, if you only use the high-level options and the graphical installer that may be different, but then comparing it to those distros is very disingenuous.

        • 2xsaiko@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          I know of companies like Serokell that specialize in it, and I know that some others use it internally for CI. Generally if you want a Nix job you’ll have to specifically look for that I think

    • 0x4E4F@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Mhm. The exact same reason why I would recommend them to anyone that actually wants to know how Linux works, the dos and donts (like why having 2 or more package managers is a REALLY REALLY bad idea).

      • QuazarOmegaA
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        having 2 or more package managers

        Are you referring to Bedrock?

        • 0x4E4F@sh.itjust.worksOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          No, just a bad experience trying to actually run 2 of them on the same system. One was the main, the other was supposed to “patch” what the first one lacked… and then I realized that compiling from source and packaging with the original (first) package manager is a lot less painful than trying to juggle with both of them.

          • QuazarOmegaA
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            Oh that’s what you mean. I’m wondering, what did you do to be able to use 2 at the same time?

            • 0x4E4F@sh.itjust.worksOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              Well, you just set the second to ignore all inconsistencies regarding libraries and binaries from the first one. It sounds easier than it is to actually put in practice 😂.

              I was just experimenting, trying to see if the trouble is worth it… it’s not. Way too many ways to still fuck up your system… and I eventually did 😂. Luckily, I use BTRFS with snapshots, so no harm no foul, I just rolled back everything from the day before I decided to install the second package manager.

              • QuazarOmegaA
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                7 months ago

                Oh I see, well that sounds like it was an experience, maybe not a really good one though XD

                Good on you for keeping snapshots, they’re real life savers!